Hmmm
something fishy here for sure
were both cars tuned on the same day?
what was the AFR's?
The boost seems about right for the Gen 2 with EcuTeK
We have done heaps of comparisons like this and never seen the data the same way
What gear were they done in
Why was the Gen 1 dyno stopped at 160 km / h ?
and did they both have the same tyres and pressures as this can effect results a lot on a roller
BTW we are back next month so please call me and we can triple check everything is ok
---------- Post added at 11:29 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:23 PM ----------
A roller dyno will always read MUCH lower than a Hub dyno
but 50 kw is a LOT lower and is lower than waht roller dynos do here in Sydney.
I suspect the dyno is using different calibration data that is efefcted a lot by the input temp sensor...
but thats just a guess
however if one run was number 17 and the other 70 odd thats a LOT of time difference and inlet temps can have a 10 kw effect on variations alone!
so what was the daytime, morning or arvo weather on the day?
and was the dyno room running good air flow to the intercooler?
We have seen 15kw variation in power runs on the same car after multiple runs when air flow is poor
I BET the car/s had no dedicated air duct to the top mounted Intercooler
---------- Post added at 11:31 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:29 PM ----------
"good tuner"
If this was done by MRT Ben is the best MPS tuner in Australia
He / we do all the training, testing, map development and race car tuning
---------- Post added at 11:34 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:31 PM ----------
If you want to call it a "shitty ecutek" tune then come and we will give you a refund if it was done by MRT!
MAX boost on any MRT MPS tune
always tapers off at a set boost level, thats to save the engine from breaking a con rod