No, I've never experienced smoking
Yes, and I have a completely stock exhaust.
Yes, and I have a cat-back or race-pipe.
Yes, and I have a turbo-back or downpipe.
For those interested in further clarifying this, please respond to the poll and state your case. Please no "it's just a bad part" without backing this up with some information.
re: can't damage the seals because they're inside the housing - I have recently in a clients laptop seen bearing damage in a hard disk due to a slight mis-alignment of a retaining mechanism. It wasn't obvious when things are screwed down, nothing seemed excessively resistant but that small misalignment caused the bearings to squeal when the system was turned on or the laptop to vibrate when gentle pressure was placed on the outside of the case, where one would often rest ones wrist. I never would have thought it possible, but it seems it is.
It got escalated to me because the lower level techs were all scratching their heads...like....????
The bearing is enclosed in the center of the casing, the casing is quite rigid; billet aluminium and the only portion of the bearing visible sits nowhere near anything that could foul it.
Forgive me for not being convinced the seals can't be damaged in service because they are inside a housing.
Yes, I am playing devils advocate a little here, but this is simply to try and get clear data, as this is something that has not really been clarified in other discussions I've seen.
The backpressure explanation seems plausible.
I have to say - if this is a common widespread issue in many MPS, I would not expect the vehicles to meet their advertised emissions, making them unroadworthy and placing mazda in all kinds of sh*t if it can be demonstrated to be the case.
I am not convinced it is that widespread because I fail to see how this could go on for a long period without degrading and becoming an obvious fault.
No problems for me (yet) Oct 06 build, registered Feb 07 with 43,000kms on the clock, only engine mode was the CPE CAI at around 30,000kms am doing the exhaust next, most likely corksport TBE, Apologies for hijacking but any recommendations from anyone? ie. should I do the mod before the warranty expires in the hope that it will produce smoking???
i aont got enough km's on my 08 to find out. only at 13500km at the moment
Ive got no issues yet. 07 Build, 35,xxxKMS.
Stock exhaust..
Would engine coolant show up in an emission test though, aside from the plumes of smoke immediately apparent when the seals have failed I dont know what sort of result you would achieve, I can understand how oil would foul up sensors and cats altering the basic emissions from the vehicle.
My understanding is that emissions tests would not detect anything in the case of leaking seals if secondary combustion is occurring in the cats. Also as Matt has suggested, a coolant leak in the turbine housing would be unlikely to register anything on an emissions test given that ethylene glycol burns mostly into water molecules.
Emissions tests sample hydrocarbon (HC) which is unburnt fuel, and carbon monoxide (CO). A good testing machine will also sample oxygen and carbon dioxide, not because they are pollutants, but because comparing the ratio of O2 and CO2 to HC and CO allows a more detailed analysis.
I don't think the sniffer is looking for the right things in this case. And since we're discussing emissions tests, it's a given in the testing world that cats mask a lot of the nasties that could be coming out of an engine.
Here's an example:
"Reading HC and CO at the tailpipe to diagnose emission problems may not give you the complete picture because the catalytic converter "masks" many problems by significantly lowering HC and CO in the exhaust. "
This is not really my area of expertise, but I suspect you could put a smoking MPS onto a sniffer and pass the test. Although it obviously wouldn't pass the visual test.
It would seem that paradoxically, a discussion of emissions testing strengthens the theory that the cats are masking what could be a widespread problem.
Gone to Volvo
If it's oil leaking, I'd expect fairly quick thick smoke symptoms, cat poisoned and O2 sensor fouled + foul smell. I doubt there'd really be much chance of masking this for any length of time.
If coolant, I wouldn't be expecting much smell from ethylene glycol and water. Burn't plastic smell doesn't strike me as consistent with a coolant leak. I could be wrong.
With regards to emissions, presuming this is coolant leak - I would expect reduced CAT temperatures, potentially resulting in markedly higher oxides of nitrogen in the exhaust. While the HC / CO / O2 ratios are the main things to measure burn characteristics, elevated NO levels in exhaust might be a good indicator of the CATS efficiency which in turn might help indicate an otherwise undetected coolant leak at the turbo. Not to mention the obvious additional H2O.
I am wondering if anyone noticed coolant or oil being consumed prior to the turbo seal failure becoming an evident fault?
Last edited by Nexus; 08-04-2009 at 07:12 PM.
Mine is Nov 07 build, was noticeable early on in it's life (April 08 Dyno Day in Brisbane) but then "went away" for a while. Now at 27,000km, and it's an issue. I have people back off from the back of my car in traffic, was also sitting at idle in a cloud of my own smoke the other week. Heading to my dealer the next couple of weeks to see if it's worthy of a warranty replacement.
Car is stock except for SRI/CAI.
---------- Post added at 07:31 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:26 PM ----------
I have a feeling I could be going through coolant, normal running temps have been noticeably higher (on the Scangauge) over the last 6 weeks or so , which has coincided with the increased symptoms. Must admit I haven't even looked at the oil yet.
Do a google search on the chemical composition of engine coolant. There are all sorts of things in it that would produce a noxious odour when combusted ie burning plastic smell, but none of these things are sampled during an emissions test.
The emissions thing.....Why would you put 2 cats in? To meet new emissions laws. Any sign of dropped emissions would result in Mazda flagging the car to be checked (stock or not) If you fit an AM exhaust you'll probably get only 1 cat, hence the newly aquirred smoke issues.
The turbo seals.....If they were as fragile as people say, it might happen. But they spin up to 100,000rpm. Any sign of failure would result very with a very quick failure. I've had this problem with other cars (just not the MPS, yet.) Mine failed becuase of repeated 30+ psi (read abuse). You'd have to be brutal in fitting an exhaust to damage the seals. CES have a unique "tongue" on their split dump pipe, which is fed into the housing, hence the careful nature in fitting.
Try changing the oil to a different grade, the fact that some of you have changed the gearbox oil (for the "wong wong" noise) leads me to believe the engine oil could be the same.
If your car is smoking only slightly have it checked by a professional, if its not the turbo, it could be a number of things. Restricted air filters will result in the engine/turbo working harder to draw the air and will most likely suck oil from the rocker cover, this is why most stock turbo cars with over 7 psi of boost have catch cans fitted. Repeated use of dirty air filters and high boost pressure will cause the oil consumption too.
What do the "smoking" cars use in the way of fluids? Oil? Coolant? Both? Something else?
Last edited by 2XS; 09-04-2009 at 06:41 AM.
Achievements
2009 Jamboree Street Compact Winner
Aust. Quickest and Fastest MPS
12.3 seconds @ 111Mph.
Proven over the Qtr mile
Another Mazda 3 MPS - Almost fully bolted - Waiting for a turbo upgrade - The weekend hack.
Toyota Yaris - Coilovers, rollcage, raceseats, harnesses, 18s - Also waiting for a turbo upgrade.
2011 AWD Territory - White and Slightly lowered on 22s - The tow car.
2011 RWD Territory - Black on black and slammed on 22s - The family transporter.
I fully agree with you mate.
I've had no "smokin" or other issues with the top of the range fully Synth Castrol Edge Sport 0W-40 which is a good start. Best oil i've ever used to be honest, and I highly recommend it. If you've been using 50/50 synth/mineral oil and changing every 10,000km, then stop right there. Changing every 10,000km is absolutely insane for a performance vehicle, and as a result, you'll have a lot of carbon deposits which will give you grief at around the 40,000km mark (thats only frigging 4 oil changes in 40,000km!). Every day joes out there forget that carbon build-up in oil prevents the heat escaping, and as a result not only do you get more wear, but a much hotter motor. The added friction from the carbon also heats up your piston heads, which transfers the heat to the rods also.
Ok, now im off topic.........
I've been using the Castrol Edge Sport stuff since it was released, and when I changed over from 50/50 synth/mineral (the stock Mazda $hit) I did 2 quick changes initially to "flush" (@ every 2000km) and after that I went back to 4000-5000km changes. Doing this gets reduces the carbon deposits left over from the 50/50 oil real quick. After I dropped the last lot of oil @ approx 4000km, it still looked like new (hardly any carbon deposits - eg. darkening of the oil)
I also HIGHLY recommend that if you've flashed or piggied your MPS to get more grunt, then you'll wanting to be changing fluids to the high performance stuff and changing more frequently (say every 3000-5000km) to reduce wear & tear, which will extend the life of an upgraded 2.3ltr motor.
Last edited by Wardski; 09-04-2009 at 09:32 AM.
Good post Ward
very good suggestions
I think I will change oil as I have been changing every 5000 but using what Mazda put in.
I like the idea of flushing the system
For my intermediate oil changes, I was doing it myself, but for $60 (and I supply the oil) I've had APC in underwood do the oil change & filter for me (and tighten the chassis while they're draining the oil)
Makes sense really. Whats $120 every 5000km when you could be doing far more damage to a $16k motor.
I have always changed my oil at 5000kms...and my car is really stock.
I have now completed over 80000kms and no problems.
Mazda do the service every 10K...and i do the 5K myself inbetween...i have told Mazda this..as they always ask me why my oil is so clean.
I use the same stuff as Wardski...and find it to be the best around.
As said...if you cant do it yourself....then pay the $50 or so...its worth it in the long run.
Happy Motoring
duglet
I am sorry for steering off the main topic but I have a couple of questions regarding the oil change;
What do you guys recommend for people who are doing less than 10,000kms between service interval? So we change our oil every three months or so?
Also, I have been using Motul 8100xcess 5W40 since the first oil change, not sure if this is a good enough oil for our engine.
Thanks guys. Very informative thread, by the way!!
Hey Taz,
There was some discussion awhile back on oil changes here
http://www.ozmpsclub.com/forum/tech-...servicing.html
In relation to turbo seals, I spoke to my Mazda dealer when I was having my diff bolts done and they have had 2 cases of a stock MPS 3 and 6 coming in smoking and needing the turbo seals fixed. He advised me that if I was concerned I could always take out a years extended warranty prior to my factory warranty expiring, about $400 or so.
Cheers
Chris
R36 - Just like an MPS6 except with a growly V6