Yes thats more like it but what would it cost?Quote:
Originally Posted by DISIMS3
Col :burnout:
Printable View
Yes thats more like it but what would it cost?Quote:
Originally Posted by DISIMS3
Col :burnout:
Yeah i agree....same thing that lets the rear end of the gen2 3MPS down as well imo, are the crap angle and size of the tail lights!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by shakespeare
mmmm Tasteful, but prob the only new suby I like. .Quote:
Originally Posted by DISIMS3
Is now pointless to get an STi.....
Until they make a new STi. Will be interesting to see what they look like
Have they fixed any of the cheap interior garbage??
How does it make it pointless? They are mechanically different..
i think what he/she means is that it looks the same as an sti now,where as before their was a huge difference in looks and mechanically,which is why your paying $70k for an sti,to look and drive different than a wrx.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jmac
Fair call on looks. :)
The current WRX sedan and this new proposed one look tops. I'd be happy with either. Bloody good value for money too.
^^^
Ban him!!!!
:p
Damn, then I would have to ban myself al, because I agree!!
^^^
ban him too
:p
Exactly on the money. Why pay $70k for the top specced machine that now looks like the $40k version?Quote:
Originally Posted by mpssylo
That being said sure they can't really compare due to the huge differences that the STi has..
Maybe the next sti will be more radical..
what huge differences??Quote:
Originally Posted by rfzd
The other garbage that makes up the +$20 to +$20k price difference, what ever that might be..
Engine internals, drive line.Quote:
Originally Posted by rfzd
Still looks cheap and nasty, and even more so now with the stupid 4wd like offest and clearance, and vents that do nothing (points to vents near front tyes)
4 door kia rio bodykit with a half decent 4 pot 4wd. No thank you i will stick with the Mazda body language any day of the week.