User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 33

Thread: Disconnecting plumb back hose from stock BOV

  1. #1

    Default Disconnecting plumb back hose from stock BOV

    Hey guys,

    tried to do a seach but the word BOV is too short

    What i would like to know, are there any issues with running a non plumb back bov on the car, as in 100% atmo???

    If not, then there should be no reason i cant pull the stock plumb back hose off, and block it, there for allowing my stock bov to vent to ATMO

    Anyway as a play around we tried this and it seems to work well!! only issue on cold start the car is a lil rough for 10 secs

    Can anyone see any real issues running this>

  2. #2

    Default

    Umm off the top of my head

    Every time you change gear (or step off the gas) you will run MEGA rich and probably backfire pretty badly if you rev it hard.

    I believe running so rich may damage your cat and cause it to prematurely fail.

    If it matters your car will be illegal (at least in Vic but probably in many other states)

    If you are just doing this for the noise, may I reccomend a short ram intake? Most of the fun, none of the draw backs... that I know of.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Newcastle
    Posts
    1,413

    Default

    I tried it years ago, sounds great but the factory bov is poo and leaks under vacum, the occossional back fire at closed throttle lol

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    S.E melbourne
    Age
    46
    Posts
    330

    Default

    It will sound better but it will drive terrible. Something about the STD bov makes the gear shifts smoother???? I tried full vta for awhile and put the stocker back on for something and the car was so much nicer to drive. Sold the bov straight away. I did miss the crackle and pop when driving hard- sounded tuff as! No damage caused and 3 years/100k of driving.


    Also:: The stock valve blows very slowly and sounds stupid when venting. Grab a proper one if your going to do it. although just to prove my point go and test it lol. you wont do it again.
    Last edited by TUFMPS; 11-12-2010 at 04:06 AM.
    " if you can't beat 'em join 'em"

    New car : FPV FG F6 310

  5. #5

    Default

    Nepharius is dead right. Forget it, unless you have a piggy back that enables you to incorporate fuel cut. All you'll do in 100% VTA without this measure incorporated is wash your cylinder walls with raw fuel and dilute the cylinder wall lubricant. And have lots of backfires. And soot out your cats. And risk blowing out your exhaust prematurely. None of this is good.
    Get a duel port BOV and run it 50:50 for the same sound but no disadvantage.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Surrey Hills, Victoria
    Age
    49
    Posts
    5,866

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by buzurk View Post
    Hey guys,

    tried to do a seach but the word BOV is too short

    What i would like to know, are there any issues with running a non plumb back bov on the car, as in 100% atmo???

    If not, then there should be no reason i cant pull the stock plumb back hose off, and block it, there for allowing my stock bov to vent to ATMO

    Anyway as a play around we tried this and it seems to work well!! only issue on cold start the car is a lil rough for 10 secs

    Can anyone see any real issues running this>
    As per all the replies above. I wouldn't mess around with trying to get this working. If you want the BOV noise, grab a Turbosmart and VTA. Yes it costs money, but it's doing it properly
    Caff Mobile Mk1 - 2010 Aluminum Gen II | 2XS SRI | H&R Lowered Springs | cpe 75 Duro Engine Mount | Whiteline Rear Swaybar | Moog "Problem Solver" Rear Endlinks | 3M Carbon Black Tint | Lakin Custom Plates | Opti-Coat Paint Protection | Paint Correction by Me - SOLD

    Caff Mobile Mk2 - 2008 BMW Z4M Coupe - Sapphire Black Metallic | Stock....for now

  7. #7

    Default

    CAFFIEND, I think you mean 50:50 with the Turbosmart, not 100% VTA. If so, I agree.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Sydney
    Age
    49
    Posts
    1,834

    Default

    A lot of guys in the states were running like this, short of the occasional pop on gear shifts I don't think it caused too many other issues, I think Doug may be over dramatising the issue a little, these engines are known for having fairly high levels of fuel dilution in their oil due to their DI nature.
    The technical reasons as to why this occurs is that you are confusing the MAF sensor, you are allowing metered air to escape the system, which the ECU cant account for and adds fuel for air that isnt there.
    Im not sure how technically minded you are, but I will try and explain, the MAF sensor calculates the amount of air coming into the engine for it to set the amount of fuel it needs to inject to maintain a stoichiometric afr, if you vent this air to the atmosphere the ECU has no record of it leaving the system, believes it is still there and adds the required amount of fuel, as the air is not in the system , the fuel added gives you a momentary rich environment, which doesnt completely burn, resulting in unburned fuel entering the exhaust manifold / turbine housing, the temperature....etc etc, pop out the exhaust.

    Do you really need your bov to vta, its already pretty loud in full recirc with an after market intake anyway (pretty sure I read you had one somewhere), if you just have to have the loud pssshhh sounds, I recommend a 50/50 bov that will keep the ECU happy as part of the air is being recirculated.
    Nearly all men can stand adversity. But if you want to test a man's character - give him power.
    Abraham Lincoln

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Surrey Hills, Victoria
    Age
    49
    Posts
    5,866

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Doug_MPS6 View Post
    CAFFIEND, I think you mean 50:50 with the Turbosmart, not 100% VTA. If so, I agree.
    Yes mate, the dual port.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Perth, WA
    Posts
    4,540

    Default

    I'm also inclined to recommend the Turbosmart Dual Port unit. Run it in 50/50 and set it correctly. I used to get the occasional backfire but in saying that I didn't get round to tensioning the spring correctly. I still maintain that most of my noise is intake (induction) related, the CAI is fairly loud when on boost, especially driving through Perth city


    With great power comes great fuel consumption...
    M P S
    - 6 - RR | Cobb AP | CAI | TIP | ATP GTX28R | 3.25" TMIC | SS DP | REM | 3" Zorst | SSP Anchors & Countershift | DBA Rotors | K/Springs | Upper & Lower Bracing | Alpine Type S 12" sub MRP-M500 Amp
    | Grille | STi Lip | Shark Fin | 6000K HID | Fog Light Tint | Twin DEFI gauges | Custom Decals & Badges | LED lighting | CF Mirrors & Pillars | Black rims Red callipers

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Surrey Hills, Victoria
    Age
    49
    Posts
    5,866

    Default

    Rog, what's 'sdw' on your cai pipe mean?

    BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Perth, WA
    Posts
    4,540

    Default

    "Suck Da Wind" Thanks for asking!!

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    9,459

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Caffeine Fiend View Post
    Rog, what's 'sdw' on your cai pipe mean?

    BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
    Quote Originally Posted by rogwick View Post
    "Suck Da Wind" Thanks for asking!!
    thanks for the laughs guys.
    Newbie FAQ My Build Thread
    From stock, to GT3071, to substantially less modded, many lessons learned!
    3" HTP | 100 Cel DP | Autotech HPFP | AP V3 - Self Tuned on E20 | JBR RSB | CPE S2 REM | JBR Shifter Bushings

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Mornington Peninsula
    Age
    42
    Posts
    1,659

    Default

    Jon = Not a fan of Atmo Vent.

    -1
    Atmo Vent = Buy a VL Commodore...

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    S.E melbourne
    Age
    46
    Posts
    330

    Default

    even vl's dont do atmo vent. they do no bov at all.

  16. #16

    Default

    BUZURK, Hi. Back to your original query. Apart from all the prior comments including my own, I think just reefing the bypass pipe off the stock BOV and blocking the bypass extension to the turbo inlet would just look like a bodgy job. You would certainly VTA 100%, but with all the negative results already described.

    The function of the bypass it to divert pressurized air back to the inlet side of the turbo when the throttle plate closes, rather than allowing a standing pressure wave to surge back from the closed throttle plate to the outlet side of the turbo and bringing on compressor stall. A 50:50 bypass still permits this turbo-protective process to happen, while also relieving some of the boosted air to atmosphere to give the classic BOV discharge sound. There is no other real benefit to having a noisy BOV, apart from to one's ego if one is that way inclined.

    An adjustable BOV like the Turbosmart enables you to tune the BOV so that it dumps just enough air into bypass to keep the turbo happy, but also discharges the rest to atmosphere. I ran 50:50 for a while, but I have so much air dammed up in my long plumbing system that I was still getting compressor stall on throttle closure, so I have replaced the VTA blocking plate and converted the BOV to 100% bypass again. One problem I find with the Corksport bypass extension is that it is a significantly smaller diameter than the OEM one, and I find this restricts the bypass somewhat. Anyway, I have no BOV "chuff" now but I attract less attention and improve overall shift performance and keep the turbo spinning, ready for throttle opening again, as opposed to having to let it spool all the way up from a stalled condition. BTW, that's another VTA negative I forgot to mention.
    CP_e Standback & PNP; CP_e 3" SS Downpipe; Corksport FMIC with Top-mount K&N filter & OEM Ram CAI; Turbosmart BOV; Dashhawk; Prosport Boost Guage; JBR solid shift bushes; DBA 4000 Wiper-Slot front rotors; Hawk Ferro-Carbon HPS Street front brake pads (@ 69,000km); Sumitomo HTRZIII's in 225/45 x 18

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Newcastle
    Posts
    1,413

    Default

    The passion of the BOV debate.

  18. #18

    Default

    Thanks for the replies guys who helped, ill get myself a real bov then

    the debate is a good one, the comments about the VL, get over it, i have a turbo car and if i want to make noise i will!

  19. #19

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rogwick View Post
    I'm also inclined to recommend the Turbosmart Dual Port unit. Run it in 50/50 and set it correctly. I used to get the occasional backfire but in saying that I didn't get round to tensioning the spring correctly. I still maintain that most of my noise is intake (induction) related, the CAI is fairly loud when on boost, especially driving through Perth city

    Rogwick, Do you remember how many turns you gave your Turbosmart BOV when setup??? as ive got the same one!!! Believe it's correct (well runs well) but my tension caps more facing upwards then to the upper lHS like yours!!! just wondering thats all!!!
    2006 MAZDA 6 MPS - LIQUID SILVER METALILIC - MILDLY MODDED FOR NOW.............

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Perth, WA
    Posts
    4,540

    Default

    I haven't got round to setting mine up for VTA (with no backfire) At the moment I have it blanked. I've been meaning to try VTA with correct spring tension.
    I know Doug has a Turbosmart unit too and I believe he has set his. It's a guess check and improve and also depends on mods (back pressure of exhaust) perhaps making a difference from my setting to yours?
    I still get the occasional pop but that's when I'm off throttle usually coming down hill in 4th/5th gear.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •