
Do the MPS3's have the same engine specs as the MPS6?
If so I'm assuming 6's are having similar issues with engines going boom?
I think I'll just sell my standback and avoid a dyno I don't want to risk it...

If u have a standback dont tune it to the max. I have stock engine at the moment running 210kw atw. Tuned with cpe flash and standback but its been tune to run smoother not max power ( mps garage hit 240kw on one run but pulled it back to 210kw ) Cars go boom ( most) from boost spikes, and people tuning to run big power. keep ur standback go to a good tuner run standard boost and have them tune to run smoother u will still get a power increase from standard.

Hi Luke, A hydraulicked engine will quickly bend a rod too, as will a bad case of over-advanced ignition.

Yes. but this is part of the tuning ( the later). they do this for more power but run the risk of BOOM, safe tune will lessen this

Well in my expert opinion, these engines are running on the wrong fuel
Scotch is where it's at these days
![]()
If my recollection is correct, the MPS6 runs 9.7:1 compression, MPS3 9.5:1
I specifically recall asking with interest and watching the specs when they were released and I'm sure the MPS6 has higher compression.
I remember when asking about comparitive outputs between 6 and 3 - "drop the compression and up the boost, eh?"
2007 Aurora Blue MPS 3 - 18x7.5+48 Enkei RPF1 shod with 225/45R18 - 3.5" ETS TMIC - 75Duro CPE mount - HKS/CPE BPV - 2XS turbo inlet - 2XS short shift plate - 2XS "compact" shortest equal length turbo manifold - 2XS Racepipe - Leather/Aluminium handbrake - Momo shifty knob - 7" touchscreen - JDM Mazda Navigation box - PC based GPS and instrumentation - 36AH reserve battery + isolator

NEXUS, that's the recipe. It's common to significantly reduce compressions to increase cylinder volume and thereby accommodate more A/F mix. We used to use thicker head gaskets when supercharging.

