Tunehouse

User Tag List

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 22 of 22

Thread: My ported intake manifold...

  1. #21
    MPS2NV's Avatar
    MPS2NV is offline Resident Filth Monger
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Newcastle
    Posts
    395
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mazspace
    0 ride(s)

    Default

    http://www.google.com.au/search?sour...trol+injection

    Due to the way direct injection works atomisation is no longer an issue compaired to port injection which where alot of torque has been gained, the stratergy with 2 ports per cyl was to try and create earlier response and torque which is not a strong point of earlier turbo engines.

    Although im sure the shutter valves do exactly what they are designed to do they fail, what I mean by fail is that the same result can be seen by removing them and port matching to remove the problems in flow in the port runners. Air flow, air speed and temperature is all effected and soon I hope to have the flow results of my cylider head so these things can be seen. The inlet will no doubt have an effect to these readings. It food for thought.

  2. #22
    qtrmile beast is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    37
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mazspace
    0 ride(s)

    Default

    If i recall my machinist said that my head will flow about 250 cfms vs about 210 i believe stock..


    HERE is STOCK



    And HERE IS MY HEAD... Sorry for not using a caliper to measure this with. I was in a hurry when i thought about doing this but you can see the BIIIGGG difference in the ports!!!

    Currently the fastest recorded speed6 in the USA

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •