iTunes on sale!

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 25

Thread: Recirculating BOV do i really need to replace?

  1. #1
    Ranton's Avatar
    Ranton is offline Beeched as Bro'

    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Auckland New Zealand
    Car
    Mazda3 MPS
    Posts
    576
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mazspace
    1 ride(s)

    Default Recirculating BOV do i really need to replace?

    If so why?

    And whats the difference between these three?







    apparently they all fit the MPS3?

    How can i tell if mine is leaking?

  2. #2
    MattMPS3's Avatar
    MattMPS3 is offline Forum Staff

    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Sydney
    Age
    36
    Car
    MPS3
    Posts
    664
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    The BOV debate has been going on for some time, there has always been a question mark over the boost holding capacities of the stock bpv over an aftermarket unit, particularly if raising boost levels, I will ask though, do you trust a piece of injection moulded plastic in a high temp scenario to hold your boost.

    As far as aftermarket valves, aside from the additional psssshhhhht noises hybrid valves offer, users have commented on better response and reduced lag on shifts, whether there is any real world evidence to support these claims is where the debate lies.

  3. #3
    Ranton's Avatar
    Ranton is offline Beeched as Bro'

    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Auckland New Zealand
    Car
    Mazda3 MPS
    Posts
    576
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mazspace
    1 ride(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MattMPS3 View Post
    The BOV debate has been going on for some time, there has always been a question mark over the boost holding capacities of the stock bpv over an aftermarket unit, particularly if raising boost levels, I will ask though, do you trust a piece of injection moulded plastic in a high temp scenario to hold your boost.

    As far as aftermarket valves, aside from the additional psssshhhhht noises hybrid valves offer, users have commented on better response and reduced lag on shifts, whether there is any real world evidence to support these claims is where the debate lies.
    I think the main Difference in changing to a hybrid is all in the users head.. no offence to any one.. but yeah..

    From my experience with Volkwagens etc the First Factory Released Recirc valve was shit.. the housing cracked and the spring and diphram was weak..

    People would replace them with Forge Piston type Recirc valves.. for the first month they are fine altho the piston is no where near as responsive as a diphram but people tend to forget about pulling apart and servicing the valves so they keep a good seal...

    The revised plastic Recirc valve released by VW ended up being the best Recirc valve you could possibly fit to your car.. it wouldnt leak and had a heavily weighted/sprung diphram and it was only 65NZ$ to replace if it ****ed out.. not that mine ever did after 120,000 kms dealing with 22psi boost spikes etc.. and harsh driving...

    I just wonder thats all..

    because with my CAI it almost sounds like the Recirc valve is taking some responsibility for boost regulation so i assume mine may be ****ed..

  4. #4
    LittleredMPS's Avatar
    LittleredMPS is offline Senior My Butt

    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Blue Mountains
    Age
    39
    Car
    2010 MPS 3
    Posts
    799
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mazspace
    1 ride(s)

    Default

    I bought the forge BPV in the first picture.

    The difference is not staggering, but there is one.

    You will find lag when changing gears is a little less, and that the engine seems to pull harder further into the rev range than the standard plastic fantastic BPV does.

    The side mounted Forge BPV also makes no real noise at all. I was told to expect a cash register sound, but nup, nothing.

    Personally I recommend it.

  5. #5
    Nepharius's Avatar
    Nepharius is online now Senior Member

    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Melbourne
    Car
    Mazda 6 MPS
    Posts
    182
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mazspace
    1 ride(s)

    Default

    Well I cant tell you any advantages but I can tell you the difference between the top two. The top one is the revised Forge the second one is the old one. The main difference or at least the one they set out to rectify was that the old one (the second one) makes a kind of swords clanging style sound when you change gears which annoyed people. The third one I have no idea... is that a BOV instead of a BPV?

  6. #6
    MattMPS3's Avatar
    MattMPS3 is offline Forum Staff

    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Sydney
    Age
    36
    Car
    MPS3
    Posts
    664
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I was running a GFB Hybrid in mine for a while, it was a good valve, but regular servicing is a must, and I only ever used it set to full recirc anyway, I ended up switching for the lower maintenance HKS diaphragm style valve as the GFB was a bit of a battle to get to with the FMIC in place.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Mackay QLD
    Car
    MPS3 Black
    Posts
    37
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mazspace
    1 ride(s)

    Default

    Ive got a turbosmart one... Its changable to Psshhh... to no Psshhh. If you ever get a chance to hold the stock in one hand and the aftermarket in the other... needless to say you'll know which one to use. Compared to the turbosmart, the stock felt like it came from a toy truck. Boost reponse was a bit 'sharper' (i guess is the word) too.
    Have fun, just make sure you dont crossthread your bolts on install

  8. #8
    Ranton's Avatar
    Ranton is offline Beeched as Bro'

    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Auckland New Zealand
    Car
    Mazda3 MPS
    Posts
    576
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mazspace
    1 ride(s)

    Default

    The main differences i believe you will find in the first too is that (From what i can judge by the exterior of the valve)

    Top Picture the Valve operates with a Piston like all the others.. however then the piston is UP (The Sealed position) the boost loads up against the side of the piston untill the Piston is drawn upwards by the connecting Vaccume Line
    This design has very little reliance on Spring Pressure holding the piston in the sealed position as the boost is side loading on it. its probably more responsive and moves more freely

    the Second Design is where the boost loads up directly against the base of the piston (unsprung side) and the Piston remains sealed against the boost forcing it open due to a heavy sprung Spring on the other side.. & the Vaccume line pressurising the opposite side also.. untill the throttle is released and the vac line ends up sucking the piston back up...

    The Design of the top one makes more sense to me than the second one.. i think the second one is more suseptible to leaks if a soft spring has been used..

    ---------- Post added at 04:22 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:21 PM ----------

    Are there any other Diphram types available

    im still not a big fan of piston types

  9. #9
    Doug_MPS6's Avatar
    Doug_MPS6 is offline Forum Regular

    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Perth, WA
    Car
    Mazda MPS6
    Posts
    358
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    The appeal of using after-market as opposed to OEM is that some after-market BOV's are adjustable so can be made to operate to suit your mod configuration. While some good sources seemingly in the know will tell you that the OEM unit leaks boost above ~15psi as a protective measure (though that won't often be admitted by those close to the manufacturer), I still have issues with this argument.

    Firstly, the wastegate is designed to bleed boost when it exceeds a certain value and secondly the OEM BOV (and aftermarket BOV's too) operate in neutral pressure mode when on-throttle (on boost) as it has the vac line off the top and boost in the main body, which equal each other out, so even if you were feeding 50lbs of boost in, the BOV wouldn't know about it as it would still be in equilibrium. Some folks think still think the BOV is a boost controller - it's not. It's what its name says it is.

    The only time the BOV is under differential pressure is when the throttle is closed. The vac line sucks the piston up and the boost in the main manifold blows the piston up at the same time.
    Last edited by Doug_MPS6; 05-03-2010 at 06:34 PM.
    CP_e Standback & PNP; CP_e 3" SS Downpipe; Corksport FMIC with Top-mount K&N filter & OEM Ram CAI; Turbosmart BOV; Sumitomo HTRZIII's in 225/45 x 18

  10. Thanks Ranton thanked for this post.
  11. #10
    Ranton's Avatar
    Ranton is offline Beeched as Bro'

    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Auckland New Zealand
    Car
    Mazda3 MPS
    Posts
    576
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mazspace
    1 ride(s)

    Default

    I completely agree with you doug!

    Althou just my luck i was giving her a bit of stick on the way back from the Local Snow Dome Tonight.. and notice that in 6th at about 3000rpm and upwards it almost seemed to be loosing boost and there was a fluttering noise..

    just my luck the day i query the use of after market valve it almost seems astho the diphram has worn out on mine and is now flapping about slightly....

  12. #11
    Luke's Avatar
    Luke is offline MMMMMMM MPS

    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Adelaide
    Car
    Mazda 6 MPS with Leather
    Posts
    168
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Agreed, A new BOV will do Sweet FA. It's the noise that makes people think it's actually doing something, save your money.

  13. #12
    Ranton's Avatar
    Ranton is offline Beeched as Bro'

    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Auckland New Zealand
    Car
    Mazda3 MPS
    Posts
    576
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mazspace
    1 ride(s)

    Default

    ill pull mine off tomorrow see if i can pressurise it and see what happens..

    if faulty me thinky a new blacko plastic one will do me fine...

  14. #13
    Ranton's Avatar
    Ranton is offline Beeched as Bro'

    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Auckland New Zealand
    Car
    Mazda3 MPS
    Posts
    576
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mazspace
    1 ride(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LittleredMPS View Post
    I bought the forge BPV in the first picture.

    The difference is not staggering, but there is one.

    You will find lag when changing gears is a little less, and that the engine seems to pull harder further into the rev range than the standard plastic fantastic BPV does.

    The side mounted Forge BPV also makes no real noise at all. I was told to expect a cash register sound, but nup, nothing.

    Personally I recommend it.
    So What springs were you guys using in your valves..

    I recieved mine today

    and it came with the Yellow Pre installed and the Red and Blue one in the box?

  15. #14
    DISIMS3's Avatar
    DISIMS3 is offline Stay Tuned

    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Cairns
    Car
    Mazda 3 MPS
    Posts
    1,139
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Most people who reviewed the valve in the US say the blue spring works best with our cars.

  16. #15
    Ranton's Avatar
    Ranton is offline Beeched as Bro'

    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Auckland New Zealand
    Car
    Mazda3 MPS
    Posts
    576
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mazspace
    1 ride(s)

    Default

    Hmmm.. Im running with the Yellow So far under fullish boost there is a slight flutter..

    Will chuck the bluey in later on.

    Take for a Drive..




  17. #16
    Doug_MPS6's Avatar
    Doug_MPS6 is offline Forum Regular

    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Perth, WA
    Car
    Mazda MPS6
    Posts
    358
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Ranton, Hi, if you were really "giving it stick" in 6th at only 3000 rpm, and I'm assuming by that you mean that you were flat to the floor, it's highly likely that it was not your BOV fluttering and leaking but your wastegate dumping off excess boost, as you had a high load at relatively low rpm.

    There are distinct differences in the sounds made by each, and if you were on throttle, the BOV should not have activated anyway, for the reasons I defined before, as its piston is under neutral pressure.

    6th is a very tall gear with a big step up from 5th and is best treated as a cruise gear, with serious pull needs best being left to 5th.

    Any issues I have with boost relief or slowness of the BOV to dump all that FMIC (and related plumbing)-contained boosted air as fast as I would like on throttle lift-off come in 6th at relatively low turbine spindle speeds.

    I can't recall when I floored it in 6th, if ever, but even at ~30-50% throttle opening and ~3,000-4,000rpm, the amount of air dumped on sudden and total throttle closure easily exceeds that handled by bypass and vents huge amounts immediately and noisily to atmosphere, almost enough to sweep the streets clear of leaves!.

    (We read here a while back of some member wondering why his engine would rattle badly and blow smoke when flat to the floor in 6th at 1500-2000rpm!! That was his poor engine about to have conniptions due to relatively high boost levels at high engine loads. We don't know what octane rating fuel was being used, though that appears to be academic at this combination of rpm and TPS).

    Hope this helps. Cheers.
    CP_e Standback & PNP; CP_e 3" SS Downpipe; Corksport FMIC with Top-mount K&N filter & OEM Ram CAI; Turbosmart BOV; Sumitomo HTRZIII's in 225/45 x 18

  18. #17
    Ranton's Avatar
    Ranton is offline Beeched as Bro'

    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Auckland New Zealand
    Car
    Mazda3 MPS
    Posts
    576
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mazspace
    1 ride(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Doug_MPS6 View Post
    Ranton, Hi, if you were really "giving it stick" in 6th at only 3000 rpm, and I'm assuming by that you mean that you were flat to the floor, it's highly likely that it was not your BOV fluttering and leaking but your wastegate dumping off excess boost, as you had a high load at relatively low rpm.

    There are distinct differences in the sounds made by each, and if you were on throttle, the BOV should not have activated anyway, for the reasons I defined before, as its piston is under neutral pressure.

    6th is a very tall gear with a big step up from 5th and is best treated as a cruise gear, with serious pull needs best being left to 5th.

    Any issues I have with boost relief or slowness of the BOV to dump all that FMIC (and related plumbing)-contained boosted air as fast as I would like on throttle lift-off come in 6th at relatively low turbine spindle speeds.

    I can't recall when I floored it in 6th, if ever, but even at ~30-50% throttle opening and ~3,000-4,000rpm, the amount of air dumped on sudden and total throttle closure easily exceeds that handled by bypass and vents huge amounts immediately and noisily to atmosphere, almost enough to sweep the streets clear of leaves!.

    (We read here a while back of some member wondering why his engine would rattle badly and blow smoke when flat to the floor in 6th at 1500-2000rpm!! That was his poor engine about to have conniptions due to relatively high boost levels at high engine loads. We don't know what octane rating fuel was being used, though that appears to be academic at this combination of rpm and TPS).

    Hope this helps. Cheers.
    Lol

    No im talking 3rd Fourth and high Rpm so no a excessive loading on a poor 6th gear at low rpm

    the slight Flutter is heard in conjunction with the intake noise..

  19. #18
    KRNAGE's Avatar
    KRNAGE is offline Senior Member

    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Melbourne's West
    Car
    Black MPS3
    Posts
    234
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    dont use yellow unless v2 is a bit different, at least blue and then start to add shims - youll feel the difference. im about to go back to blue +2 shims to see how it goes (v1 here, with wutang swords )

  20. #19
    Hama3 is offline Full Member

    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Canberra
    Car
    True Red MPS3
    Posts
    59
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Ranton,

    Where did you purchase the BPV? Was is Street Unit or RPM store?

  21. #20
    Doug_MPS6's Avatar
    Doug_MPS6 is offline Forum Regular

    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Perth, WA
    Car
    Mazda MPS6
    Posts
    358
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Hi Ranton, if you are sure you are throttle-on and you are hearing induction noise and a flutter then it means you are still generating boost and your flutter may be wastgate doing its job.

    A BOV should only produce a noise when the throttle is closed. The wastegate bypass sounds more like an intermittent pssshht....pssshht....pssshht, accompanied by apparent loss of or reduction in boost.

    A closed throttle activating the BOV to Bypass (whether setup to 50:50 or 100%) will sound more like a fast, progressively downtoned whoo-whoo-whoo. If you are set up to 50:50 Bypass/VTA and boost has been more aggressive, closing the throttle will activate the BOV to produce the initial whoo-whoo-whoo to Bypass but also the often heard loud pssssshhhhtt (beloved of tuners) as the excess is vented to atmosphere (VTA).

    If you don't have a BOV opening due, say, to a malfunction, or perhaps one that is screwed down too tight, you will prevent it opening to Bypass or VTA, the result being that the boost pressure wave backs up against the turbo and stalls it, producing a fast downtoned whrrrr..whrrr as the turbo spools down rapidly. Preventing this is the sole purpose of the BOV.
    CP_e Standback & PNP; CP_e 3" SS Downpipe; Corksport FMIC with Top-mount K&N filter & OEM Ram CAI; Turbosmart BOV; Sumitomo HTRZIII's in 225/45 x 18

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts