
There's an mx5 for track work, I'm not really planning to do much with this at all. Lowering is purely for aesthetics currently.

Quite right. Everything is a compromise. The trade off for progressive rate springs is better ride quality at the expense of greater body roll and pitching. Linear is definitely better for track use.
I'm not aware of any packages but you can get Bilsteins for around $1000 (ask GSL Rallysports for a quote). They will suit most lowered springs.
The issue with the dampers is twofold: Any increase in spring rate will make the damper work harder as it attempts to damp the excitation of the spring and bring it under control. Every little road surface irregularity causes the spring to be excited so it's a constant process - ie the damper is working constantly while the car is in motion. Road surface condition has more effect on stroke length than valve actuation frequency. The other issue is using a stock damper that has a stroke length different to the new spring, the mis-match increases the likelihood of the damper bottoming out which can be destructive. This is obviously more of a function of road surface condition than the normal wear process. It's really not surprising that stock dampers quickly fail when used with lowered/stiffer springs.
FOR SALE

Nuliaj: Hatches are only really half a car anyway.
shinslinger66: And you forgot to add that they are also a girls car!