Shock! Software dynomometer calculates consistent believable figures!

[Nexus]

Highest of three peaks recorded over a long trip
166Kw 299Nm

atw figure, I believe. I'm not sure of the whole calculation's detail, and I haven't gotten ALL of the vehicles (07mps3) constants entered into the software yet, although everything relative to this calculation is there, I think.

Recorded a boost peak of 17.8 PSI

Performance modifying mods are a 3.5" ETS TMIC and a CPE/HKS BPV, and that's all.
Ambient temp was 11C, IAT was about 13C and although I wasn't monitoring BAT, given the norms I've observed with the ETS fitted, average BAT of about 15C.

Not suggesting it would pull that on a real dyno, but I am finding it a very believable peak in the conditions.

Really liking newer version of DashCommand. The default makes my attempts at dashboard design look kinda ghetto.

[DISIMS3]

It sounds about right?

[tricache]

That looks awesome!!!! CarPC with that running please!!!!!

[Nexus]

Apart from being kinda cool, it's a way of benchmarking and observing the effects that a modification installation has.
So it will be interesting to see how this figure changes as mods are added.
I won't be changing the turbo-back, or the intake but should see some gains on that.

[bd581]

Those figures look much more realistic than some of the figures being thrown around. Its much closer to the Mazda claims so i think it will be much easier for people to understand and compare

[Nexus]

Just realized the 299Nm reading might be the torque @ 166Kw.
Check out the peak indicator on the torque gauge itself - it's indicating 420Nm
Still familiarizing myself with the software

[Nexus]

No, just checked the dashboard code and that seems to be 299Nm torque peak independent of the Kw. There's a bug in the layout. I'm gonna cram some more gauges in while I'm at it.